<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Horton and Frame&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farcountry.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/horton-and-frame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farcountry.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/horton-and-frame/</link>
	<description>Going outside the camp.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: znielsen</title>
		<link>http://farcountry.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/horton-and-frame/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>znielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farcountry.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/horton-and-frame/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts Greg.  Needed clarification.  Forest from the trees baby.

z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts Greg.  Needed clarification.  Forest from the trees baby.</p>
<p>z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schneerawk</title>
		<link>http://farcountry.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/horton-and-frame/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>schneerawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farcountry.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/horton-and-frame/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Just a thought here...and I may be wrong. But I wanted to say that Horton/Frame are 99.9999999999999 % on the same page: with the historic creeds, with the gospel, with thier respective confessions (URC three forms of Unity and PCA Westmin Standards), and their desire to see culture transformed by the Kingdom of God through the corporate (Church) and individual (People) identity of those he&#039;s purchased. Now this is not a vain attempt at eccumenism, nor is it one that would flatten a very important issue, just a reminder to myself that these two men both love Christ and desire to see his kingdom spread. On the issue of Kline vs. Kuyper, or 2 Kingdoms vs. Transformationalism, I would say that both Frame and Horton agree up to the highly nuanced level. Horton leans more to Kline, Frame to Kuyper, but neither is &#039;sectarian&#039; in their position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a thought here&#8230;and I may be wrong. But I wanted to say that Horton/Frame are 99.9999999999999 % on the same page: with the historic creeds, with the gospel, with thier respective confessions (URC three forms of Unity and PCA Westmin Standards), and their desire to see culture transformed by the Kingdom of God through the corporate (Church) and individual (People) identity of those he&#8217;s purchased. Now this is not a vain attempt at eccumenism, nor is it one that would flatten a very important issue, just a reminder to myself that these two men both love Christ and desire to see his kingdom spread. On the issue of Kline vs. Kuyper, or 2 Kingdoms vs. Transformationalism, I would say that both Frame and Horton agree up to the highly nuanced level. Horton leans more to Kline, Frame to Kuyper, but neither is &#8217;sectarian&#8217; in their position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
